![]() Rebel Yell - Opinion Red Rock should be saved from development Classy is not a word to define Las Vegas. Even the Bellagio Hotel has slime on the walls. When a California-based housing development firm decided it was time to make strides in boosting the population near Red Rock canyon by generating 8,400 million-dollar homes, we knew money grubbers hit a new low. Red Rock Canyon, a national conservation
area and home to some of the most beautiful sights in the Mayor Oscar Goodman said in a press conference last week that even though this matter is out of his district and ultimately his hands, it would be a shame if such an idea would follow through to completion. The only local spot where you can escape the smog and tourists is also the only place that nullifies the sparkle that labels our town cultureless. Teenagers make out at Red Rock. Nature lovers find peace at Red Rock. Producers use Red Rock as a backdrop for cinematic masterpieces. Grandmothers from all over the country get closer to God at Red Rock. Why would anyone want to litter our beloved sweet spot with Mercedes-driving, cell phone-gabbing snobs. That's what Summerlin is for. At a public information forum last week, hundreds of concerned mud-slingers shot daggers at John Laing Homes representatives when the most important question of the night was uttered by a 12-year old girl who stepped up to the mic and asked, "Is there any other reason to do this besides money?" The crowd applauded. Hopefully, the county will turn
this request down and leave the snowy tips and burnt umber hills
vacant. Until then, the citizens of Blue Diamond will continue
to worry while rest of the valley explodes over a $5 bill tucked
neatly in some stripper's G-string.
|